Point out why you are better than them, and try to find contradictions or concessions they have made in the case. It is best to just summarize the thesis and major points and be done. Speeches, and papers as well, should come full-circle. Obviously, the speech itself should be tight enough were one point builds upon the another. © 2020 ForCom - All Rights ReservedInquire on ForCom Sponsorship. There are two common issues orators face when bringing their speeches to an end. Simply recap with the mentality of “I just have to reiterate what I already told them.” This is important for two reasons. A couple of main points not mentioned in the conclusion can be the difference between two places in overall assessment. Leave people remembering the wonder of the speech--and possibly with one zinger of a clincher. Yet, it seems to challenge many orators. Here are the parts of the conclusion: Reasons (signposts) Repeat the resolution. Secondly, it provides a so-called “book end” to the speech. Let's look at an example: For example, if an anecdote was used in the introduction, the conclusion is a clever place to state the resolution. Answered April 22, 2018. (Normally, the anecdote will present a major problem and then transition to the thesis. The conclusion of the first affirmative constructive speech or the 1AC is quite simple. This does not mean that content cannot be creative, but it does not give complete freedom to be creative with format. This is to, again, bring everything full-circle and to allow an audience to see the relevance of the introduction as an element of persuasion. State what might happen if certain actions were followed or rejected. One other thing to note is that a quotation can be used in the conclusion. This style presents an opportunity to quickly, concisely, and sometimes wittingly present the lesson learned throughout the speech, the answer to the anecdote’s problem, in the conclusion.) Over the next few paragraphs, typical problems that competitors meet will be discussed. To conclude, be precise when writing an Oratory’s conclusion. Orators tend to have difficulty not only knowing when to end their speech but how. There are so many orators who take the last minute of their speech and consider it an opportunity to cram as many facts in as possible. If this can be accomplished a speaker will prove themselves organized and creative. The conclusion is a summary. It is best to just summarize the thesis and major points and be done. Summarize what has already been stated in the body of the speech (namely the thesis and main points) in new words. The question is, if facts are being forced in at this point, what was being said during the last nine minutes of the speech? But, a speech gains strength further by firmly declaring the stance. Conclusions may also call for action or overview future possible research. Concluding with a song or a poem is generally not a good idea (out-of-place and random). Make your conclusion precise, concise, and clear… Further, this final line or so should serve as a clincher--a thought-provoking statement about the speech which should resonate with the audience. Be confident with the reiteration being captured within the conclusion, as it is the essence of an Oratory. Do not go off on a tangent in your conclusion. First, they tend to not know when to end their speech. If using a quote, make sure it is quick and witty to prevent audiences from thinking a new point is being introduced. Even a speech started with the best of introductions, and developed well within the body paragraphs, can be ruined by a flawed conclusion. This does not mean that content cannot be creative, but it does not give complete freedom to be creative with format. A conclusion is merely a summary of the speech, so restate the thesis and the main points and end. In short, an effective conclusion is the introduction in reverse. A quote can make or break a conclusion though, so speakers must be careful. A speaker knows them because they created the speech, but to an audience this is all new. This is not the time to bring up new points. Your debate speech conclusion must be attuned to all of the speech that preceded the conclusion. In keeping with the reverse concept, the last element to include in a conclusion is a sentence or two which eludes back to the introduction’s attention getting device. For a good conclusion, comparison is the key. First of all, it solidifies to the audience what the speech’s stance and main points are. Concluding with a song or a poem is generally not a good idea (out-of-place and random). Overdoing a conclusion usually kills a speech. Then one sentence is said that lets people know they are finished. Another common mistake orators make with the conclusion is trying to be too creative. When transitioning into the speech’s final thoughts, restate the thesis but not exactly the way it was originally stated--reword it. This is key; especially when the judge is critiquing organization.