"They might be saying that they want Brew Dr to change its labels even more, or add some kind of statement for a limited period, but the main reason is that they want to make money. Cultures, enzymes, yeast, function sanitize_gpt_value2(gptValue) | [Editor's note: The products pictured in the lawsuit reference "billions of live and active cultures" and "billions of beneficial bacteria, yeasts and organic acids" on product labels, but do not appear to use the term 'billions of probiotic bacteria. Asbestos Compensation: Can You Sue for Mesothelioma? Bazer v. Brew Dr. Kombucha, No. As the kombucha market matures, its sales are beginning to level off, potentially making it harder to weather repeated lawsuits as when it was a nascent, hot category. Many of our attorneys also have government experience and expertise in multiple areas of the law. Amos cites one advertisement that claims that “each bottle hosts. Amos says he selected Brew Dr. Kombucha because he read the advertisement that it contained “billions” of “beneficial bacteria, yeasts and organic acids.”, However, the plaintiff states that laboratory testing determined that the company’s Clear Mind kombucha only contains 50,000 CFUs of probiotic bacteria which is “far less than the ‘billions’ advertised on its product labeling.”. ", Asked about the substance of the latest complaint, he added: "It is entirely possible that Brew Dr. Kombucha has billions of probiotic bacteria measured using some metric other than CFUs and that its label statement is not literally false. | Technical / White Paper. In the case of Brew Dr. Kombucha, removing any mention of probiotic content prevents the company from touting health benefits that were previously part of its image and could affect sales.